Copyright Aid Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in   Main siteC A Main Site 

A few Computer Code Copyright Queries

 
   Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Law

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Law
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sloke
New Member
New  Member


Joined: 13 Oct 2011
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:42 pm    Post subject: A few Computer Code Copyright Queries Reply with quote

Hello

I have a few questions regarding a computer program I have created.

-If I create a system on a piece of software eg. Microsoft Excel and Visual Basic, am I protected even by using these to produce something?

-If I have made this for the company I work for, but has not been set as a task to create by my company, does this mean I would own the copyright so if they wanted to edit/manipulate it and say it's their own, I would be able to take legal action against them.

-If a system inputs data into another system that isn't my own but dosen't manippulate any of the source code of the system that is not mine, would this infringe the system that isn't mines copyright?

Any advise would be much appriated.

Sloke
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AndyJ
Oracle
Oracle


Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Posts: 1521

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Sloke,
The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 has been amended a number of times (partly in response to EU Directives) to try and keep the law relevant to today's technology and needs.
A computer program is treated as if it was a literary work. That is to say if the code you have written exhibits sufficient originality then it is subject to copyright. Originality here does not mean that no-one else has done this before, merely that the work originated through your skill, judgement and effort. Merely cobbling together a set of library routines or scripts written by someone else probably wouldn't qualify unless the complete program showed a very distinct step forward in the utility of the program. It is worth pointing out that under UK law computer programs cannot normally be patented (ie give the creator a monopoly right over it) although this is an area where things are changing. It is also worth noting that the definition of a 'program' is fairly woolly. It probably does not extend down to a macro or simple script, but it does not necessarily need to be a fully separate entity (such as a runtime application) and of course it can rely to a greater or lesser extent on the operation of other programs (like Excel or an operating system) to function correctly.
So chances are that what you have created is subject to copyright. As to who owns the copyright, the law says that something which is created 'in the course of employment' is owned by the employer unless there is an agreement to the contrary. Many employers reinforce this by putting an explicit clause in a contract of employment which assigns copyright (as well as other IP rights) to the employer. I assume you don't have such a clause in your contract. If you do, then it will entirely depend on the exact wording as to where you stand in this case. But assuming there is no such clause, as you have correctly identified, it all depends on what is meant by course of employment. The fact that writing programs may not be part of your job description, and the fact that you were not explicitly asked to write the program may not be sufficient to say this was not in the course of your employment. If by writing this program you achieved something which directly benefits or affects your actual job (say you work in the accounts department and you wrote a payroll management program) then this would probably be seen as being in the course of your employement. However if you were a lathe operator working on the factory floor and you wrote a payroll system, this would probably be sufficiently separate to be seen as not in the course of employment. Other factors to consider are the degree to which the management have encouraged, supported and sanctioned your work on the program, whether it was written and develpoped in company time, and if you have received any bonus etc for your work. If you are in a union it would be worth asking their legal department to advise you on your specific case.
If you own the copyright to your program, then it would be an infringement for someone else to alter or edit your code without your permission. It is permissable for someone else to de-compile your program in order to find out how other programs may interact with it, if this information cannot be obtained by another means.
And lastly, if your program interacts with the output of another program, we encounter another facet of the law: database right. Previously a collection of data (ie facts) was not subject to copyright, but with the creation of evermore sophisticated databases, since 1998 a new right has been created to protect the intellectual effort and economic value which goes into creating and maintaining databases. A structured collection of data can attract database right if there has been a substantial investment in obtaining, verifying and presenting its contents. Investment can mean either in terms of money or human effort or both. The owner of the database (usually a company) must be based in or have an operating presence in a country within the Europena Economic Area to qualify. In other words a company based solely in the USA would not be able to claim database rights unless it had an office or computer centre etc within the EEA. The owner of the database right has the right to prevent extraction or re-utilisation of a substantial part of the contents of the database. Generally access to data will be controlled by a licence. This could be free or paid for (eg BT's database of subscriber's telephone numbers is free for indiviudal online queries, but you need to pay for their CDs). A substantial part may be defined in terms of sheer volume, or in terms of intrinsic value. For example Amazon might have a vast database of its customers and what they bought, but the use of one specific field of data (eg sales by book title) might be considered substantial due to its economic value to a rival. Extraction is fairly self-explanatory: it can be permanent or temporary and by any means (including manual copying). Re-utilisation means passing on the data to the public, either as is or in a modified form.
So if your program uses the output from a database which is not owned by you or your company, you need to make sure your use of the data is permitted and if an extraction licence is required. However there is no specific problem (as far as copyright and database right are concerned) with the output from your program feeding into someone elses's database or program. If this activity has not been authorised by the owner of the other system, you need to make sure that what you are doing does not contravene the Computer Misuse Act 1990
_________________
Advice or comment provided here is not and does not purport to be legal advice as defined by s.12 of Legal Services Act 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sloke
New Member
New  Member


Joined: 13 Oct 2011
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some very interesting and detailed information there, thanks AndyJ, I was looking at the piece were it says about the computer misuse act and because the system controls data for the same company that supplies it, I presume it wouldn't contravine the computer misuse act as it isn't using it for recklessness or supplying it to another company. Anyway I will look into my contract and see what/or if it says about copyright.

Thanks again

Sloke
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AndyJ
Oracle
Oracle


Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Posts: 1521

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi again Sloke,
The key word in the offences under the Computer Misuse Act is 'unauthorised'. Clearly the Act is also aimed at malicious rather than incompetent individuals who gain access to a computer system, so a disgruntled employee who has authorised access but misuses his access to cause damage or to steal information would also be guilty of an offence but a person responsible for some poor code which results in damage or failure (eg the recent RIM/Blackberry datacentre software upgrade fiasco) probably would not.
_________________
Advice or comment provided here is not and does not purport to be legal advice as defined by s.12 of Legal Services Act 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Law All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
 

You must be logged in to post  Log inLog in
Want to join in? New members are always welcome  RegisterRegister & join the discussion

 

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group