Copyright Aid Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in   Main siteC A Main Site 

A few basic copyright questions..

 
   Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Basics

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Basics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jflynn
New Member
New  Member


Joined: 22 Feb 2013
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:21 am    Post subject: A few basic copyright questions.. Reply with quote

Good morning,

I have a few questions regarding trademarking, copyright and I wonder if you can help me.

- If I would like to use an image which isn't on your database, does that mean it is not under copyright or trademark?

- If there is an image which is listed as 'dead' and the company which it belonged to is now liquidated does that mean it is not under copyright or trademark and I am free to use it?

- If there is a trademarked or copyrighted image which is covered under several classes, can I use it on a class of item of which isn't prescribed in the coyright/trademark?

From a business POV I would like to produce items with football club crests. Is there anything I can do legally to make sure people are clear it is unofficial merchandise they are buying?

Many thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AndyJ
Oracle
Oracle


Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Posts: 1582

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Jflynn,
I have already answered the copyright question in your other posting so I won't repeat that bit here.
In theory copyright continues for its full term even though the current owner can't be found; this situation leads to such works being known as orphans.
Copyright terms are governed by the lifetime of the person who created the work (for instance a book, some music, a song a piece of art or a photograph) plus 70 years after they die. However if the author was an employee of a company at the time the work was created (and it was part of their job to create such works (for instance like journalists) then the company will be the owner to the copyright but the length of the copyright term remains based on the lifetime of the author.
Trade marks are quite different in this respect. Once they have been registered, they need to be renewed periodically and to remain in use in the class(es) for which they were registered. On that basis they can remain protected almost indefinitely. There are many trademarks which are well over 100 years old and still valid today.
As for using a registered trade mark in a different class, if you used the identical mark that would almost certainly be infringement, especially if it could be shown that your use might cause damage to the reputation of the true owner of the mark, but if you used a similar mark which did not confuse the public as to the origin of the two lots of goods, then that might be OK. A good example of the latter would be the word Apple in connection with both computers and the the Beatles music. although the logos of the companies have to be different.

Unauthorised use of a football club's crest on merchandise - even if you make it clear it is unofficial - would almost certainly get you in to conflict with the club. There are several levels on which legal action could be taken against: copyright in the logo, (which as I mentioned above lasts for some considerable time), trade mark infringement if the mark has been registered, and passing off. Passing off is a branch of civil law which exactly covers the situation you asked about. The club would need to show that they have goodwill attached to their logo (even if it isn't a registered mark) and that this will be damaged if you are permitted to continue selling your goods, and that there must be an element of misrepresentation which will lead to confusion in the minds in the public.
_________________
Advice or comment provided here is not and does not purport to be legal advice as defined by s.12 of Legal Services Act 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jflynn
New Member
New  Member


Joined: 22 Feb 2013
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

AndyJ wrote:
Hi Jflynn,
I have already answered the copyright question in your other posting so I won't repeat that bit here.
In theory copyright continues for its full term even though the current owner can't be found; this situation leads to such works being known as orphans.
Copyright terms are governed by the lifetime of the person who created the work (for instance a book, some music, a song a piece of art or a photograph) plus 70 years after they die. However if the author was an employee of a company at the time the work was created (and it was part of their job to create such works (for instance like journalists) then the company will be the owner to the copyright but the length of the copyright term remains based on the lifetime of the author.
Trade marks are quite different in this respect. Once they have been registered, they need to be renewed periodically and to remain in use in the class(es) for which they were registered. On that basis they can remain protected almost indefinitely. There are many trademarks which are well over 100 years old and still valid today.
As for using a registered trade mark in a different class, if you used the identical mark that would almost certainly be infringement, especially if it could be shown that your use might cause damage to the reputation of the true owner of the mark, but if you used a similar mark which did not confuse the public as to the origin of the two lots of goods, then that might be OK. A good example of the latter would be the word Apple in connection with both computers and the the Beatles music. although the logos of the companies have to be different.

Unauthorised use of a football club's crest on merchandise - even if you make it clear it is unofficial - would almost certainly get you in to conflict with the club. There are several levels on which legal action could be taken against: copyright in the logo, (which as I mentioned above lasts for some considerable time), trade mark infringement if the mark has been registered, and passing off. Passing off is a branch of civil law which exactly covers the situation you asked about. The club would need to show that they have goodwill attached to their logo (even if it isn't a registered mark) and that this will be damaged if you are permitted to continue selling your goods, and that there must be an element of misrepresentation which will lead to confusion in the minds in the public.



Absolutely fantastic.
many thanks, this answers everything.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
typonaut
Experienced Member
Experienced Member


Joined: 31 Dec 2010
Posts: 79
Location: London

PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AndyJ wrote:
A good example of the latter would be the word Apple in connection with both computers and the the Beatles music. although the logos of the companies have to be different.


I'm not sure this is really a good example, given that Apple Corp (the Beatle's record company) initially licensed the name to Apple Inc (formerly Apple Computer Inc), and that the two companies subsequently had legal tussles over the use of the name (latterly by Apple Inc in connection with music) which seemed to go on for about 20 years.

The High Court in London eventually decided that there was no confusion between the two brands, essentially because Apple Inc was a much larger and more visible company. This seems an odd decision given that Apple Inc had agreed to stay out of the music business, but had basically built its current public identity and size on breaking that agreement.

To show the way that this was ingrained in Apple Inc, when System 7 was released in the early 1990s one of the system warning/error sounds was named "Sosumi" (So sue me), it is still in MacOS X today.

For JFlynn's benefit, there is a case that deals directly with disclaimers about the unofficial nature of football-related merchandise: Arsenal Footbal Club PLC v Reed.

I believe that part of the rationale for Reed losing this case is that, despite his disclaimer on his stall as to the merchandise being unofficial, people seeing the goods remotely from that site, or receiving the goods as presents, would not know of the disclaimer and may associate the merchandise with Arsenal (ie assume that it is official merchandise).
_________________
Any comment on this forum is just banter, it is not legal advice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Basics All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
 

You must be logged in to post  Log inLog in
Want to join in? New members are always welcome  RegisterRegister & join the discussion

 

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group