Copyright Aid Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in   Main siteC A Main Site 

Sign writer is very angry

 
   Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Infringement

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Infringement
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Spoon77
New Member
New  Member


Joined: 22 Feb 2013
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:03 pm    Post subject: Sign writer is very angry Reply with quote

Hi

I went to a van sign writer and he presented me with my company name in a certain font: Stoves at Aberdeen (town name changed).

During a joint session on his computer we ended up with the "at" on its side in red in a black box.

For various reasons (I lost confidence in first guy) a few months later I went to see another sign company and showed them the work.

They said they could not use the "at" bit but using the font was okay because it was proprietory.

I went with the second company.

We signed my van using the same font with the word "at" in orange (not in any box or anything). The new company made me a new logo out of the "o" (a pod stove with orange fire in it).

The first guy saw my van and phoned me very irate. He said the idea is his and he's taken people to court before and he is going to send me a solicitors letter or smalls claims court or whatever unless I pay him 240 as the copyright is his. He has sent me abill for this amount. We never, by the way ever discussed a fee.

Where do I stand?

Thank you

Jules
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AndyJ
Oracle
Oracle


Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Posts: 1522

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Spoon,
This sounds very petty. I assume that first sign writer is claiming copyright in the complete design (ie the overall look and feel of his design compared to what you actually went with). Based on just three words, only one of which appears to have any "artistic" element to it, it is hard to see where truly creative input comes into the issue. Clearly the first writer did not design the font, he merely used it for two of the three words, none of which he originated. The one element which appears may be truly original is the "at" on its side, but since you didn't use that bit in the way he designed it, in the final version, he can't claim infringement over that. Since there are only so many ways in which the word "at" can be written, I think that arguing this point alone could be countered with an application for dismissal on the basis of 'de minimis' - ie the point is too trivial to waste the court's time with. The final point at issue could be the positioning of the three words relative to each other. If this was truly 'artistic' and not just a commonplace way of creating a striking effect, then it is just possible this might be the basis of a claim
But on what you have told us, I don't think he has a good case. However, if you do get a solicitor's letter and it spells out that the detail of his claim is quite different to my analysis, it would be advisable to get proper legal advice.
If he decides to go straight down the Small Claims route, make sure that when you receive the Particulars of Claim form from the court, you return it promptly and make it clear in your Denial of the Claim that you at no stage entered into a contractual arrangement with the signwriter, and that the dispute concerns an allegation of copyright infringement, which of course you also deny. The County Courts cannot hear cases concerning copyright so they should strike out the Claim. If for some reason they don't, you will definitely need to get advice from a solicitor to try and get the matter stopped from going ahead in the small claims court. Whatever else you do, make sure you comply with any deadlines set by the court and attend any preliminary hearings or case mangement conferences, otherwise there is the chance of the complainant could obtain summary judgment by default.
The signwriter would need to be either very rich or foolhardy (or both) to proceed with a claim of infringement based on what you have told us. However, it is amazing what angry people will do despite calm advice to the contrary.
_________________
Advice or comment provided here is not and does not purport to be legal advice as defined by s.12 of Legal Services Act 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spoon77
New Member
New  Member


Joined: 22 Feb 2013
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is very kind of you to take the time to reply and in such depth. Thank you.

I will think what to do.

I will keep you updated with any developments.

Jules
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Infringement All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
 

You must be logged in to post  Log inLog in
Want to join in? New members are always welcome  RegisterRegister & join the discussion

 

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group