Copyright Aid Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in   Main siteC A Main Site 

Help - album artwork on music review blog

 
   Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Law

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Law
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
gd85
New Member
New  Member


Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:34 pm    Post subject: Help - album artwork on music review blog Reply with quote

Hi guys,

Came across this site whilst looking for some guidance. Basically, I want to start a music blog where I review albums and compile my favourite albums of the year. Obviously it would look a lot better if I could use an image of the album cover with the title at the top of each review.

I've had a look around and can't find a clear answer to this. I read things about 'fair dealing' but can't work out if this applies.

Is there any way for me to use album artwork in my reviews on the blog or is it a no-go? If I can use them, is there a better way to get them besides Googling the album name and downloading an image of the cover from one of the results?

Hoping I can use an image of the album I'm reviewing, but if I can't I'll have to think of something to liven up the blog or make it interesting - all copy is dull!

Thanks in advance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AndyJ
Oracle
Oracle


Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Posts: 1523

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi gd85

You are on the right track when you mention fair dealing. The exception for the purposes of criticism or review would allow you to use a copy of an album cover alongside an article which reviews the music contained in the album. The 'fair' part of fair dealing really means that you should use no more than is necessary, so a smallish thumbnail image should be fine, as you would be using it to assist the reader in identifying the album in question, since most people will relate more readily to a graphic rather than just the album title. Just remember to credit the artwork, the copyright for which will be owned by the record company, not the artist or band.

If you wanted to be super-cautious you could ask the record companies for permission, but I don't think this is necessary, as the practice is widely used in journalism generally, and on streaming/download sites etc for pretty much the same reason as you want to use the album artwork.
_________________
Advice or comment provided here is not and does not purport to be legal advice as defined by s.12 of Legal Services Act 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gd85
New Member
New  Member


Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Andy, that's really helpful!

Just some questions on that, if you're able to answer them:

-Is there a guide size to go for? E.g. 200 x 200. I assume anything that's not full-size or hi-res is OK.

-Is there a proper way to credit the record company? I'll get the images from Google but does the name of the record company go underneath the image in small copy or anywhere on the page? Is there a need for 'Copyright' or a logo?

-Finally, I may decide to embed the album from Spotify so visitors can listen to it. Spotify provide code to do this and it shows the album artwork. Since they're a huge company with the most popular music streaming service, I'm assuming this is OK? They provide info online of how to do it.

Thanks again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AndyJ
Oracle
Oracle


Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Posts: 1523

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi gd85

Unfortunately there's no specific guidance on the size, but I think your suggestion of 'not full-size or hi-res' is a reasonable yardstick. The main principle is that you are not seeking to undermine the economic value of the original, hence my reference to thumbnail.

Something I didn't mention in my earlier posting is that if you don't actually host the image on your server (ie the one hosting your reviews) but merely link to an image legally hosted elsewhere, then some recent judgments from the Court of Justice of the European Union (such as a case known as GS Media), have declared that this is not infringing, because you have not actually made a copy of the work, merely provided a link so that the viewer's browser obtains the image directly from the source where it is legally held. This can be done by framing or deep linking or similar techniques, as long as they don't circumvent paywalls or other access controls. That then avoids all the business of providing a credit which is required by fair dealing.

However if you would prefer to use the fair dealing exception, then the usual sort of credit would be the name of the author of the work concerned. Where the author's name is unavailable, the name of the owner of the copyright should be used. There is no legal requirement for a copyright symbol or other information. However it certainly would not do any harm to include a brief statement like "Album cover © Old Dog Records 2015" as this more than complies with the requirement and reinforces the fact that you acknowledge their copyright. If you know the name of the artist responsible for the artwork, by all means mention him or her also. The credit should be sufficiently close to the image that the viewer doesn't have to hunt for it, especially where several images are included on the same page.

And yes, Spotify was exactly the sort of service I was referring to in my earlier posting. Using their service means that you would not need to host the image and thus you would not be infringing any copyright. The only time this method could cause problems is where you are reasonably sure that the streaming site is unlikely to be licensed to provide either the music or the album covers, in which case you should avoid using any of their content and you won't be liable for inadvertent infringement.
_________________
Advice or comment provided here is not and does not purport to be legal advice as defined by s.12 of Legal Services Act 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CopyrightAid
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 292

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would be cautious about deep linking images on other peoples' sites. Most webmasters view this as stealing bandwidth (i.e. their bandwidth for the image is being used to enhance your site without any benefit to the site that actually hosts the image - costing them bandwidth for nothing in return).

As a basic rule though, it is considered bad netiquette to 'deep link' to images on other people's sites and... as they control the hosting they can move/remove an image without your knowledge. Also with a bit of web-server configuration, it is possible block access, or redirect external image request to a specific image; I remember seeing a site a few years back where half the images on it stated "the owner of this site is a bandwidth thief" (or words to that effect), [do a Google image search for "Bandwidth Thief" and you will get the idea].

Personally, I would go with the low-res thumbnail and a copyright statement option.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AndyJ
Oracle
Oracle


Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Posts: 1523

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good point CA! I was only looking at the issue from a legal standpoint, and I agree that netiquette would tend to frown upon such practices as deep linking and bandwidth theft. However, clearly sites like Spotify are more than happy to provide the embedding facilities if it drives more users to their site.
_________________
Advice or comment provided here is not and does not purport to be legal advice as defined by s.12 of Legal Services Act 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Law All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
 

You must be logged in to post  Log inLog in
Want to join in? New members are always welcome  RegisterRegister & join the discussion

 

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group