Copyright Aid Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in   Main siteC A Main Site 

copyright of the impression of body parts

 
   Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Law

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Law
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
romosc
New Member
New  Member


Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:14 pm    Post subject: copyright of the impression of body parts Reply with quote

I am inrerested to know how the law would see the copyright of bodyparts or the impression left by bodyparts, eg thumb or lip prints to be used in form of artwork.

I understand from other posts that if I were to ask for a photographer to take a picture of my thumb print or lip print then he/she would automatically own the copyright to that photo.

What if however, a photographer was to take a picture of such impressions, against my wishes, that I have left elsewhere or included in other artwork?
Firstly if they are the subject of the photograph.
Secondly if such an image was mearly included in a photograph of another subject eg a (window for example).

Would I still hold copyright over these impressions as original work of my own?
Am I entitled to such a copyright in the first place?

Any input would be greatly appreciated and also very interesting to me.

Thanks for your reply.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
typonaut
Experienced Member
Experienced Member


Joined: 31 Dec 2010
Posts: 79
Location: London

PostPosted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You may be able to claim the imprint of body parts as copyright, as artistic works, or as "industrial" works (term of protection may be affected).

If a photographer records your work without permission, then this may fall foul of your rights, with certain exceptions: essentially fair dealing allows such for the purpose of review, or where the inclusion is incidental (dealt with below).

To be "incidental" the inclusion of your works needs to be non-deliberate. ie if I photograph a busy shopping street and a copyright protected image happens to be in the background (or anywhere), then that is not an infringement. Where the infringed work is being shown in a shop window, and the only elements in the window are the works, and the photograph is solely of that scene, then there may be an infringement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Law All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
 

You must be logged in to post  Log inLog in
Want to join in? New members are always welcome  RegisterRegister & join the discussion

 

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group