Copyright Aid Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in   Main siteC A Main Site 

Album Artwork

Goto page Previous  1, 2  
   Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Music Copyright

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Music Copyright
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Posts: 1665

PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The fact that the work on the CD or DVD is identifiable is perhaps important to what KJR proposes, in that it is not just any old blank CD, but one which purports to be an album of music by a particular artist. But that does not change the situation from the point of view of the artist and/or rights owner of the sound recording.
Let's look at the moral rights of the artist(s) who perform on the album. They have a moral right for their work not to be subject "to any distortion, mutilation or other modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to, the said work, which would be prejudicial to [their] honour or reputation." (Berne Convention Art 6 bis which is the source for section 80 in the CDPA). I remain to be convinced about how melting a CD or DVD so that it can no longer be played actually distorts, mutilates or modifies the actual songs being sung. What that melting treatment does is to make the songs both unplayable and unrecognisable. I think you would recognise that as a consequence of the doctrine of exhaustion of rights, a legitimate owner of a copy of a work, be it a book, CD or photograph, has the right to destroy his copy, along with several other means of disposal. What KJR proposes is simply an exercise of that right.
As far as the copyright in the sound recording is concerned, the CDPA does not advance any moral rights to the producer, so there is no cause of action there.
There is very little caselaw on the subject of derogatory treatment, but what exists*, along with recognised authorities such as Laddie, Prescott & Vittoria or Copinger & Skone James, takes a very narrow view of this moral right, and make it clear that there must be damage to the honour or reputation of the author arising from the mutilation etc. Clearly it would be extremely hard to build any case on the proposition that melting a DVD impugned the honour of the artist whose songs were on the disk.

* the best example is Confetti Records v Warner Music UK Ltd [2003] EWCh 1274 (Ch) see paras 145 -162.
Advice or comment provided here is not and does not purport to be legal advice as defined by s.12 of Legal Services Act 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Music Copyright All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

You must be logged in to post  Log inLog in
Want to join in? New members are always welcome  RegisterRegister & join the discussion


Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group