Copyright Aid Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in   Main siteC A Main Site 

What to do when someone sends you their work on spec

 
   Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Basics

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Basics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bella
New Member
New  Member


Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 3:20 pm    Post subject: What to do when someone sends you their work on spec Reply with quote

Hi there,
Looking for some advice - recently I was sent work on spec by another designer, it happens occasionally but this time the work was similar to what I was going to start work on in a few weeks.
How should I respond? I don't want the artist to think that I've turned down buying their work then made something similar themselves.
Any help would be appreciated.
Many thanks
B
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AndyJ
Oracle
Oracle


Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Posts: 1588

PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Bella,

I can see your predicament. However, copying an idea (not that I am suggesting that you are 'copying'!) does not infringe copyright in someone else's work; but if your expression of the same idea resulted in the same or similar work to the original, then the fact that you were aware of the other person's work would tend to count against your reasonable defence of independent creation. Much depends on what type of work you and the other designer are dealing with. If you have plenty of leeway to find another way of making the idea work which is clearly different to the other person, I don't think you need worry. The classic case on that sort of facts was Baigent v Random House (the so-called Da Vinci Code case) in which Da Vinci Code author Dan Brown was accused of infringing the copyright in an earlier book known as The Holy Blood and The Holy (HBHG). While it was admitted that Brown had used HBHG as part of his research, he won because the court found that although both books dealt with very similar subject matter, the expression of those ideas in Brown's book was not similar to HBHG.
An example of the decision going the other way is a case known as the Red Bus case. Here again the defendant had had prior access to the complainant's work, and unfortunately for him, had also lost an earlier infringement claim on much the same issue. On the second occasion the defendant set out to copy the idea, but to find a different way of expressing it, although the court was unimpressed by this argument and found there had indeed been infringement.

The other thing which concerns me is that you have used the word 'designer', which implies that the work you were sent (and the one you intend to produce yourself) are designs in the sense that design right may be applicable. If so then this poses serious difficulties because design right is a monopoly right, meaning that there is no defence of independent creation, and it doesn't matter whether or not you were aware of the other design before bringing out your own design. Assuming that a reasonably informed user forms an overall impression that both items resulted from the same design, then that is enough to establish infringement. Things like surface decoration may or may not count, depending on whether the other design has been registered. Where you have less leeway in making design differences - perhaps because of technical constraints in manufacturing or the end use of the item - then the more tolerant the court is likely to be in accepting similarity. The classic example here is of replacement car parts such as hub caps or bonnet badges which have look similar to the originals in order that the car appears correct after repair etc.

So having possibly given you even more bad news, I think your best course of action is to politely decline the on-spec design by saying that you are already working on something similar (there is little to gained by withholding this information; if you do produce your own design the other designer will no doubt assume that you have copied theirs anyway).
_________________
Advice or comment provided here is not and does not purport to be legal advice as defined by s.12 of Legal Services Act 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bella
New Member
New  Member


Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 5:31 pm    Post subject: Thanks! Reply with quote

Thanks so much for your reply! It is indeed in relation to surface pattern design. You've really helped.
Cheers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Copyright Aid Forum Index -> Copyright Basics All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
 

You must be logged in to post  Log inLog in
Want to join in? New members are always welcome  RegisterRegister & join the discussion

 

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group