Hi, I have a query about Soundcloud and licences.
Basically I have an agency that employs musicians performing cover versions at weddings/private events. Clients book at my website and need to listen to mp3's but my hosting space is not suitable for mp3 streaming, therefore I need to stream them at Soundcloud.
All of the tracks I need to stream are cover versions of famous songs.
I bought a years unlimited Soundcloud subscription after PRS told me just to buy a LOML licence band A for £130+VAT. They said I didn't need a PPL one as all versions are cover versions and not the originals. (but I don't know whether I might need any other licence apart from LOML too).
Basically Soundcloud are already taking down a couple of tracks I've uploaded. However as soon as I go to their copyright centre to tell them it's ok I have a LOML licence, the form looks terrifying!
It mentions legal action etc and anything I add to the form can be used against me etc etc. I don't even want to fill it in and tell them I've got a licence because I don't even know if I need a second licence and if I'm covered for this type of thing!
PRS don't even know! I've rang them a number of times now and they keep mentioning a licence between themselves and SoundCloud but I've read all about that, that's about something else entirely.
I just need to find out a) is my LOML licence band A enough to stream covers on Soundcloud. The woman at PRS didn't mention it was UK only, I think Soundcloud may reject it because people can listen globally at Soundcloud and my licence is limited to UK only?
Does anyone know how to get round this and what I need to do?
Thanks
Soundcloud and LOML/PRS
Thanks!
Thanks for your help which is really informative!
There is only really one thing I need to worry about now and it's the geographical location of my customers. Unfortunately, people are listening and booking all over the world. They cannot download the music though, only stream.
For example I have had people that are UK based but just in New Zealand visiting family for an extended period and they listen to my sound files, book and pay for their entertainment whilst in New Zealand, even though their wedding is back in the UK many months later.
I don't think the LOML licence will cover this? (The client listening in New Zealand).
With regards to the acts performing the covers live, I wonder if the venue has this covered if they have a relevant PPL and PRS licence or is it something the band needs to do perhaps.
I spoke again to PRS today and the woman on the phone mentioned that SoundCloud have obtained a PRS licence but not updated their terms yet and that's why the online dispute/'tell them I have a licence' form looks scary- it's because nothing has been updated yet their end.
Still worried to submit this form though, and due having to think on my feet, she suggested to use YouTube to stream Mp3's because YouTube have a PRS licence already.
I'm familiar with their interface and copyright and I have to say the process has been far easier.
It's also easier if the version being uploaded is a cover version. YouTube generallly just gives me a copyright notice and tells me that original artist has decided to monetise (because the video I've uploaded is a cover version not an original it makes it easier).
So in the end PRS told me to do this instead as it's free and the worst that can happen is the video is removed in certain countries (not UK though).
Thanks for your help.
There is only really one thing I need to worry about now and it's the geographical location of my customers. Unfortunately, people are listening and booking all over the world. They cannot download the music though, only stream.
For example I have had people that are UK based but just in New Zealand visiting family for an extended period and they listen to my sound files, book and pay for their entertainment whilst in New Zealand, even though their wedding is back in the UK many months later.
I don't think the LOML licence will cover this? (The client listening in New Zealand).
With regards to the acts performing the covers live, I wonder if the venue has this covered if they have a relevant PPL and PRS licence or is it something the band needs to do perhaps.
I spoke again to PRS today and the woman on the phone mentioned that SoundCloud have obtained a PRS licence but not updated their terms yet and that's why the online dispute/'tell them I have a licence' form looks scary- it's because nothing has been updated yet their end.
Still worried to submit this form though, and due having to think on my feet, she suggested to use YouTube to stream Mp3's because YouTube have a PRS licence already.
I'm familiar with their interface and copyright and I have to say the process has been far easier.
It's also easier if the version being uploaded is a cover version. YouTube generallly just gives me a copyright notice and tells me that original artist has decided to monetise (because the video I've uploaded is a cover version not an original it makes it easier).
So in the end PRS told me to do this instead as it's free and the worst that can happen is the video is removed in certain countries (not UK though).
Thanks for your help.
Hi Soundy,
On the issue of individuals who are not resident in the UK streaming your music, I think you should be OK as long as you are not actively targeting these people. Having a UK-only licence for something which goes on an internet site is fairly silly, but since PRS designed the licence for internet use, not you, I expect they understand the implications. This is probably more of an issue for them because of the rather messy arrangements which currently exist between the various copyright management organisations (CMOs) across the world.
If the music was being streamed from your own website, the solution would be to implement geo-blocking, but you don't have this facility on SoundCloud or YouTube
.
On the issue of individuals who are not resident in the UK streaming your music, I think you should be OK as long as you are not actively targeting these people. Having a UK-only licence for something which goes on an internet site is fairly silly, but since PRS designed the licence for internet use, not you, I expect they understand the implications. This is probably more of an issue for them because of the rather messy arrangements which currently exist between the various copyright management organisations (CMOs) across the world.
If the music was being streamed from your own website, the solution would be to implement geo-blocking, but you don't have this facility on SoundCloud or YouTube
.
Advice or comment provided here is not and does not purport to be legal advice as defined by s.12 of Legal Services Act 2007